Does anyone think that as a pairing they offer what we need? Similar players for me, with Thorman having a better kicking game but Horne being teh better player. Both have more of a running role than a creative one and neither are really the sort of organising player we need IMO. I'd put up with them for a year if it meant we replaced Thorman with a top quality 7 for 2010 onwards but don't see them as a long term partnership

Like I said when we signed him, my season pass money stays in the bank now, complete and utter joke.

because we've let both dykes and webster go i think we've got one lined up for 2009.

There are three positions where we have been weak for the last few years:



Scrum half.

Second Row.

Centre partner for Yeamo.

Think we're OK for 2nd row now with Crocker arriving but we're short of a prop. Still waiting for Greg Mackey to be replaced at 7

Crikey, never a truer word was said in jest!

Step forward mr Lockyer. God you lot are soooooo last year!!!

Mackey and Entat were the halfback pairing the first season I started watching FC. Awesome.

hes got a year left on his broncos contract and i'd be surprised if he left. i do expect him to be at hkr for 2010 though.

After the Rovers game Hull stated there would be changes ..now it is being done some people are still not satisfied ..Nobody knows Hulls line up yet for next season there could be other players to be added to the squad .. lets see the final line up before we start slagging people off

massively overrated richard horne alongside the poor mans richard horne, no thanks.

It's better than Washbrook and Lee.



It sould aloow Washy and Berrigan to play there best positions next season.



The fact that it's only a one year deal, tell's it's own story.



Hull knew that Dykes wouldnt be fit to play much next season, so signed a replacment at short notice and the best available at the time.