Wasn't to long ago you were baying for blood pal and whingeing non stop on here......That is when you weren't hiding and sulking.

t1t for tat mate t1t for tat, or is that gropes for fists

And look who's sulking now





Still like you said it will be all different when we go Craven park, i will be able to pee all over my shoes and have a rat burger.

Bracek wasn't sin binned for his offence. We have laws that ensure you are not punished for the same offence twice unless the punishment was deemed not to be sufficient.

Exactly, Gannon served his punishment by getting binned.



Bracek commited a shocking high tackle and ran in throwing haymakers later in the game.

Sin bin sufficient ?? Absolute rubbish ! Gannon should have been shown a straight red card and Brett correctly shown yellow for retaliation.



Bracek was cited by Hewer in his report and if it was deemed serious enough to take note of, then Hewer should have grown a pair & binned him during the game.



Sulking Vikingman, me ? Not at all. I have never once said Widnes never deserved their win.



Even the most diehard cannot be serious by thinking Gannon should not be on a charge.

But we have never gone bust old lad................Oh yes and they are our toilets and our rat burgers, not the Councils

Red card for a bit of biff? I think you'd be better trying another sport, like curling or something.

I think i might have to drag the sour grapes out for you pal.

Jesus you lot have an answer for everything.



Its all about comparisons. I have seen players sent off loads of times for what Gannon did. At the end of the day, red card, yellow card or no card (as in Braceks case) Gannon should be on a charge. The RFL have been very inconsistent with their citing on this game. The RFL have missed 1 or 2 other players who are lucky not to be on a charge and I am not just reffering to Widnes players.

Well done Terry O'connor www.barrowrlfc.com/barrow_rugby_ ... newsID=510

Well done Terry O'connor www.barrowrlfc.com/barrow_rugby_ ... newsID=510