Don't think they parted on best of terms.



By end of season not everyone at club was satisfied with Frank's contribution.



Some murmurings among players that not really pulling his weight for the team.



Radford may have given some honest feedback on where Frank lay in the pecking order based on his performances.



Seems in response Frank pretty much took his bat home instead of responding to the challenge.



By that point it was probably mutual that he would go. Sounds like we may have had to pay him off to some extent.

Pretty fair appraisal that Handbrake!!

If all this is true that Frank and the club did not part on the best of terms that is disappointing. However, if Frank has failed to acknowledge the support he got from the fans as a result of that shows a distinct lack of class.

Maybe as part of his severance package pritchard has to remain silent on the situation

I don't know any more than any body else on here, apart from a few bits of second hand information I've got. But FWIW, I don't believe it was as cut and dry as that and that a number of things weighed in.

I see the RLfans kangaroo court is in session and Frank is in the dock

By the end of the season it was felt by the club that Frank wasn't offering value for money, and that the money would be better spent on other players.



So I expect the guy was pretty miffed, and that explains his silence on social media etc.

In the scheme of things is it really important, who actually cares?



So a guy who leaves our club doesn't use social media to say bye, thank you or offer an explanation as to why and the conspiracy theorists come out in force.



I don't care incase you've not worked it out. It's no crime or insult not to use social media. He owes us nothing and vice versa.

I don't care if he thanks the fans or not (although I would have expected him to fwiw) but the concern is its not good for the image of the club if players are leaving on bad terms, especially players as high profile as Frank. It can only make future recruitment more difficult.

Do you really believe that?

Frank will not be the first, far from it and certainly not the last player that will leave a club under clouded circumstances, if at all it's true.

It will have no bearing on club recruitment.

Money talks and for every disgruntled player there's going to be more happy ones.



It's another nothing thread with a mountain being made out of a molehill.



But that's life under the microscope at Hull were paranoia can run rife with certain people.

Could be argued that the intense scrutiny / criticism of the fans (specifically on this board) is more likely to influence a prospective players decision to uproot and move to Hull.



Frank openly said he could have got a deal in the NRL for 2016, but being a man of his word he wanted to honour this contract. He also said he wanted to leave Hull having won something. For me he achieved on both counts.



That another NRL club was willing to offer him a deal subject to a release could have been part of the deal to come to Hull in the first place. I doubt we will even find out.



Frank was under unrealistic expectations. He did put in shifts, made good yards, galvanised the team and the club. Job done. Move on.

Your second paragraph doesnt make sense.

If he intended to leave then why did the family have to return to vacate their rental property,as i would have thought vacating first would save them time and money having to unnecessarily return from Australia.

Everyone involved here Club/Frank seem to be tight lipped but when you read between the lines with Kelly becoming available it seems to me the club pursued an agreement with Frank to leave if he could find a club back in Australia.

Whether that has left Frank with a sour taste in his mouth about the club we dont know but for me like you said he always put in a shift even when out of position playing as a prop.