Hull were robbed as usual.!

As the match officials are paid to do

I disagree.



The decision to award Seymour a contract was a game-changer for me. We should also have binned Turner and let Crooks play. After all, he'll be the one replacing.

Totally agree about that, but not because Turner is leaving, Crooks just earned a place IMO.

50/50 on wires first try, atkins placed his hand on turners shoulder once he couldn't get the ball



fosters try was the correct call, but no doubt if it was leeds it would have been given haha



seymour unlucky to be given as a drop out, but silverdud did go to the video ref to clarify, again if it was the other way round i wonder what it would have been called as?



wires disallowed try, correct call, briers near enough stopped to let the runner through befor putting the kick through



wire were the better team on the night and deservedly won, interesting to see john stankovich saying on twitter that if we had thrown the ball about from minute 1 instead of after 65 minutes the result could've been so different!

Foster try was a definate forward pass.

Shows he wasn't watching the game.

Maybe you never watched the game as i agree with him.

all yesterdays news and todays chip paper eh!!!!

end of the day Wire were the better team by a mile in 1st half!!! and the constant defense killed us

Good for you.



Maybe you could explain how we were supposed to throw the ball around when for most of the first half Wire slowed the PTB down so much and had such fast defensive line speed that their defenders were practically in our line by the time the dummy half passed the ball.



And that's without mentioning their efficiency in wrapping our players up to prevent the offload.



Oh - and even after all the above we [idid[/i manage to give the ball some air occasionally. And promptly dropped it. Or passed forward.

your not wrong mate