|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff74c/ff74c3915f633e09bb974ab0991a83a640f4f49c" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1253 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2022 | Sep 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| IF and i say IF,f.c.and rovers were to agree to a merger,i reckon anyone who realy loves rugby league ,would still go to watch a newly formed team,i know i would travel down for the games,the same as i do now.no snide remarks please. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/151cc/151cc365002488cc8903dbe070e1eaaf4d94334c" alt="MOTOR icon_motor.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 12672 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote edinburgh yorkie="edinburgh yorkie"IF and i say IF,f.c.and rovers were to agree to a merger,i reckon anyone who realy loves rugby league ,would still go to watch a newly formed team,i know i would travel down for the games,the same as i do now.no snide remarks please.
'"
There isn't a version that would appeal to a big enough constituency to make it worthwhile. You'd get continuity clubs starting up and all sorts of mess. Where do we rank for crowds in SL - 4th and 8th, something like that? I can't bothered to check, but they're not among the worst.
Most SL clubs need subsidy, because most clubs get subsidy, because they need it...
Merging wouldn't change that, you'd just have one club fewer.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 12260 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2023 | Jul 2023 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote edinburgh yorkie="edinburgh yorkie"IF and i say IF,f.c.and rovers were to agree to a merger,i reckon anyone who realy loves rugby league ,would still go to watch a newly formed team,i know i would travel down for the games,the same as i do now.no snide remarks please.
'"
I would bare my ass in Marks and Spencer`s window. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1cbec/1cbec54565fe867ba5f524f188b35998507c1d53" alt="ASS icon_ass.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 566 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2022 | Jul 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote barton baird="barton baird"I would bare my ass in Marks and Spencer`s window.
'"
a good enough reason foe it to never be considered
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 17440 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I wouldn't support any merger. It would be a case of throwing away both clubs history and I'd rather HullFC dropped in to the Championships and started again.
Could you imagine a Good Friday with the new 'Hull' team running out the tunnel in Blue & Yellow (Council colours) and being made to play someone like Huddersfield as we have no derby to play? with the fans having no songs to sing because the team has no history, no passion from the fans or players because there is no real fear of losing any bragging rights...it would be the death of RL in this city.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 4823 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| We would all complain and kick against it. Give it 10 years though and the next generation would not care. They would just want to support a powerful club. Which is what it would be.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 13126 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2023 | Feb 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Irregular Hoops="Irregular Hoops"We would all complain and kick against it. Give it 10 years though and the next generation would not care. They would just want to support a powerful club. Which is what it would be.'"
Why would it be any more powerful than Hull are now ? Where's the guarantee of that ?
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1174 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Mild Rover="Mild Rover"There isn't a version that would appeal to a big enough constituency to make it worthwhile. You'd get continuity clubs starting up and all sorts of mess.'"
As above.
A newly formed "Hull" club would take years (possibly decades) to establish itself. By establish, I mean create an emotional attachment for its supporters which provides the, at times illogical, bedrock of any clubs link to its fanbase.
As MR says, that is without taking into consideration the distraction of reborn clubs bearing the names of FC & KR which would be the real clubs for most people, certainly in my case. Even playing in tier 3 of RL, I would bet they could draw attendances to match the crowd figure of a frankenstein club playing in SL.
The theory that if you take club A with an average attendance of x and merge it with club B, attendance y, you will end up with a "superclub" playing in front of crowds of x + y is a fanciful one which doesn't stand up to any detailed scrutiny. The reason being is that a newly formed superclub lacks the one thing that drives all fan-club relationships, an emotional passion which defies logic by bringing us pleasure and pain in equal measure (God knows this is certainly true on both sides of the muddy River Hull).
People follow their club because it is a part of their DNA, often passed onto them by Father/Mother/Family. The newly formed club has none of those physical or emotional links and would subsequently only provide a dispassionate replica of the fandom expeirence. The interest would be there but the visceral thrill of watching your team triumph (or despair as they and you fail once more data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cfb2/8cfb200db08b7d1ae033686837d29848fb8c8859" alt="Sad icon_sad.gif" ) would not be there.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 4823 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| No guarantees. Not saying id support it. Just think you would have one club with a pick of the young players, pick of the sponsors, etc, rather than fighting each other.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 481 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2015 | Sep 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote BP1="BP1"As above.
A newly formed "Hull" club would take years (possibly decades) to establish itself. By establish, I mean create an emotional attachment for its supporters which provides the, at times illogical, bedrock of any clubs link to its fanbase.
As MR says, that is without taking into consideration the distraction of reborn clubs bearing the names of FC & KR which would be the real clubs for most people, certainly in my case. Even playing in tier 3 of RL, I would bet they could draw attendances to match the crowd figure of a frankenstein club playing in SL.
The theory that if you take club A with an average attendance of x and merge it with club B, attendance y, you will end up with a "superclub" playing in front of crowds of x + y is a fanciful one which doesn't stand up to any detailed scrutiny. The reason being is that a newly formed superclub lacks the one thing that drives all fan-club relationships, an emotional passion which defies logic by bringing us pleasure and pain in equal measure (God knows this is certainly true on both sides of the muddy River Hull).
People follow their club because it is a part of their DNA, often passed onto them by Father/Mother/Family. The newly formed club has none of those physical or emotional links and would subsequently only provide a dispassionate replica of the fandom expeirence. The interest would be there but the visceral thrill of watching your team triumph (or despair as they and you fail once more
) would not be there.'"
Top post data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ba35/3ba35c431c22e0d2ceac0695f510e7492c5df6d1" alt="Thumbs up icon_thumb.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1174 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote UllFC="UllFC"I wouldn't support any merger. It would be a case of throwing away both clubs history and I'd rather HullFC dropped in to the Championships and started again.
Could you imagine a Good Friday with the new 'Hull' team running out the tunnel in Blue & Yellow (Council colours) and being made to play someone like Huddersfield as we have no derby to play? with the fans having no songs to sing because the team has no history, no passion from the fans or players because there is no real fear of losing any bragging rights...it would be the death of RL in this city.'"
Once again, as above.
The removal of emotions in supporting a club removes the reasons why we support a club in the first place and why we all continue to support our club (whoever we may follow) even when logic tells us we will end up suffering yet again.
A cobbled together superclub has none of the emotions you describe above because for you and I it has no emotional attachment to ourselves, our lives and our history (both personal and club wise).
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 30589 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| The mergers in Oz have all worked out well.
The real opportunity to do this was when SL started. At that stage, both teams were out in the cold and had a reason to consider merger. Hull's place in SL is guaranteed indefinitely so it's hard to see a situation that would compel us to merge.
I'm sure if the clubs had merged in 1995, most of us would be supporting the new club by now
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ff74c/ff74c3915f633e09bb974ab0991a83a640f4f49c" alt="" |
|