Bombed a try in the first half, scored one in the second - it's an improvement.

What's wrong with his boots?

Don't think he is fully fit yet and does not look to be up to SL "speed". Remember he's been playing in Leeds's 2nd team so it will take him time to get back up to SL standard and that can only come with playing. Not a first choice but can kick goals at a pinch.



Think he'll turn out to be a good signing.

Let's not push it.....

The boots of a man whose ego is bigger than his ability from what I can see. But then I'd ban anything but black boots...

The very fact you need to ask that question speaks volumes about you as a man....as a human

What could it possibly say about me? 1st things 1st, if the lad does well and scores his share then he can wear a pink tutu for all I care, some people need to find something else to moan at, what a joke.

I think you might have missed a heavy dose of sarcasm...



For what it's worth, I agree - black boots should be mandatory; all this pink and purple business is just not rugby league.

Who cares what they've got on their feet, as long as they don't slip and slide all over the place like Bambi on Ice I couldn't give a flying ****.

I think it will be a great signing, give him time to get match fit and up to Super league speed, he showed some promise against Uddersfield..

Can we have a Thread for the discussion on players boots

What has this forum come to

Them there booits are alright on a ponsey back, now if a prop wore them then that would be different, he'd be thrown out of the foorrad's union. Int good old days when men were men and women knew it, a prop with hairy fairy coloured 'shoes' would have to know how to fight in order to be able to wear them. Just like Lazenby with his fore-name