"try to find a taker for Sammut?"







May be the players are backing Sammut and this is their way of showing Webster that you don't treat one of their own like he is treating Sammut.

All the things they have done are OK if the product on the field is so attractive that the demand is there.

Never thought of that, interesting way to look at it.

The Sammut things crazy. I don't know if he would make all the diff but for a player who can play at FB ,Hook, SO, SH not to get game time seems mad. Lets be honest it could not harm the results.

I've been firmly in the "sammutt in" club but he was appalling against wire and he is not breaking any pots in his dual reg games, so unfortunately as with most of the squad without an attitude adjustment he would make no difference

Looking back at previous bad years, it makes 2006 look competitive. If you think of that season, we were in the mix really until the Huddersfield game. We were toe to toe with Wigan until they beat us at their place, and by the time Kear took over, we were still within reach with six games to go (of which we lost two, I think). Compare that to this year and I would dream of the 2006 performances. We just fell a bit short and clueless at times. Now, it's hard to describe the gutless tripe we're seeing.



If Webster stays until the end of season, it shows a complete lack of foresight at the top. Anyone who knows the slightest thing about team sports can see that Webster isn't doing it. Unfortunately, some people are just made for bringing the bag of balls onto the training pitch and passing messages on. We see it all the time.



Carter will say we can't afford to sack him. I'll tell you what, we sure as hell can't afford to keep him. A new coach, a lift in performances, the crowds will return. As it stands, we will lose more money every week as people stay away, and his comment at the press conference about waiting for the middle 8's will affect season ticket sales.

Carter using the excuse that we can't afford to sack him is all well and good on his part but why can't we? Of course, it's because we gave him a 3 year deal in the first place. So who was it that agreed to that? I'm afraid our great leader also has to take a share of the blame, he well and truely had his pants pulled down there.

Carter can't sack Webster. Not because we can't afford as a club but because it would be Carter admitting he got it wrong (giving Webster a 3 year deal). And I doubt Carter had ever got anything wrong ever! Well, Apart from most of the changes he made without consulting the people who keep the club afloat.



Maybe we could do with bringing in a coaching consultant if he won't sack Webster.

Sky? Why would he need to run any changes by them?

This is revolutionary, we can't afford to sack Webster, how about he shows he has a conscience and resigns, does the right thing and saves the club money, and the chance for someone else to get us out of the sheet he's got us into.

Probably his mortgage.

Don't see Webster going of his own accord at the moment, and I don't see M C sacking him. The total lack of anything coming out of the clubs a worry .I always thought I would be supporting the club after owners come and go, Not sure I will have a club to support if things don't change soon. I have seen plenty of lows but the club have always managed to pull something out of the bag and keep the fans interest and support going, not sure the present people in charge are capable of providing that.

I hope im totally wrong and the coach , players, and owner turn thing round quickly.