Personally think everyone should be given a second chance but I think it's a bit strange how you seem to make a distinction just because Cockayne's done well since he's come over here and looks a reformed character but ateotd he was caught on cctv kicking the hell out of someones head. Not sure why Hudson isn't given the same leeway seen as he's served his time and put back into the community and been a good pro since his return. Seems ABH is more forgivable than a doping offense, or am I wrong here?

Hudson wasn't so much a drugs cheat but more naieve. At the time of it happening Hudson had returned from Australia where he'd been training during the off season and was told to take some supplements that all the nrl players had been taking. obviously it should have been his prerogative to check this out but instead he just took the advice he'd been given as gospel. (I believe it was Dane Dorahy who advised him) The bulls knew the testers were coming the day Hudson was tested and any player who had any doubts about passing the tests was told to go home for the day (a little like a former player of ours going to hospital at half time v Leeds away). Hudson didn't believe he had taken anything illegal and opted to stay, the rest as they say is history. Regardless of how it got in to his system he did the crime but he also spent the time so in my eyes he has been dealt with accordingly. He has had a decent career after his ban and has not reoffended. He can use his experiences both good and bad in helping to make young people make the right choices in their lives, yes the 'goody two shoes' like sinfield et al are perfect role models who kids should look up to but the likes of Hudson can also pass on information and experiences of being on the wrong side of the governing bodies and again help out kids on the right track. Life is all about choices, Hudson made a bad one but to prohibit him from teaching kids because of one misdemeanour is quite frankly absurd!

Clearly both are wrong. I didn't want Cockayne either but what he did was nothing to do with sport. The legal system handled his case and although I didn't like what he did I only judge him on what has now done at Wakefield.



What Hudson did is cheating in sport and although not as bad in real terms, I don't like someone who cheats both his mates and his opponents. He tried to give himself an unfair advantage.



If he becomes part of the club I'll support him the same as anyone else, I just don't think it is a decision I would make.

Not sure him and RA see eye to eye!

Just think though,we may get Lucy Jo down at the ground supporting Wakey

Doubt he'll be back. Story goes he left a fair while before the announcement that he was going to dewsbury.

it would be nice to see how many on this thread are qualified enough to be so judgmental.



Ain't a problem with his addition to the coaching staff but it begs the question why he wasn't snapped up at Cas

Cos they've got no money??

We've had these conversations before and in the not too distant past about so called poor signings,either players or coaching staff and the doubters have been proved wrong,let's try for once and see if it pans out and maybe give praise where praise is due.Myself and other parents who's child is lucky enough to be on the Wakey scholarship may be involved with Ryan at some point and I for one will support him in his effort and his knowledge to hopefully make the future stars of Wakey better players.

Has this actually been confirmed?

Oooooo i'd like to kiss her

The moral compass of the supporters of this club can be very odd at times. Some are pilloried for life, some are treated as heroes.



Met Hudson a few times, nice bloke, met far worse than him. No problem with him being on the staff. Has every member of non-playing staff at the club in the past 10 years been squeaky clean? I very much doubt it.