Mathers

Sykes

Godinet

Anderson

McShane

Kirmond

Washbrook

Wildie

Ryan

Moore

Sammut

Walshaw

Smith

Molloy

Siejka

Scruton

Riley

Owen

Gilmour

Bad news that Washbrook and Siejka are still in. That means Agar will persist with Sammut at 1 which has been no improvement than Mathers who is wasted on the wing.



I would go with



Mathers

Owen

Sykes

Walshaw

Riley



Sammut

Godinet



Anderson

McShane

Moore

Ryan

Kirmond

Smith



Scruton

Wildie

Molloy

Gilmour



Molloy on for Smith at LF

I'd go with:



Sammut

Mathers

Ryan

Walshaw

Riley

Sykes

Godinet

Anderson

McShane

Scruton

Kirmond

Washbrook

Molloy



Wildie

Moore

Smith

Gilmour



Siejka

Owen



I'm torn over Mathers and Owen

Raleigh can't get in the 19 very surprising. Gilmour and Siejka to miss out for me, Mathers back to full back please, we have two natural wingers there, surely they'll play?

It could all be a ruse! Play a bad half-back partnership in games we'll lose anyway, saving our secret weapon for the big games!

Sammut



Owen

Gilmour

Ryan

Riley



Seijka

Sykes



Scruton

McShane

Anderson

Kirmond

Washbrook

Molloy



Smith

Moore

Godnet

Mathers





Would suggest the above line up is something like the side in Agars head.

Are you being deliberately obtuse. I really don't think you're so stupid as to persist with Mathers on the wing - even if there was not an obvious alternative I don't believe you.

Mathers

owen

sykes

walshaw

riley



sammut

godinet



anderson

mcshane

moore

ryan

kirmond

washbrook



siejka

smith

Malloy

scruton

Mathers

Owen

Anderson

Walshaw

Riley

Godinet

Sammut

Ryan

McShane

Scruton

Kirmond

Smith



Wildie

Moore

Molloy

Gilmore





Out of what Agar has chosen is go with this with Siejka and Washbrook to miss out, but I think it's hugely unlikely and RA will continue to play players out of position and stick with the non performers.

Willzay what on earth have you got against danny washbrook?



You do realise over the last 6 or 7 matches he's easily been one of our best and most consistant forwards, dont you?



No, contrary to popular belief amongst the keyboard coaches he doesnt get in because he's one of Agars best mates, he gets in because he works his socks off for the side...everything that everyine is crying out for...



Over the last 7 matches he's averaging over 35 tackles per game and has missed only 11 in those 7 games....he's averaged over 75 metres gained which aint bad at all for someone who everyone says offers nothing going forward.....he's also only made 3 errors and conceded 4 penalties and has at least twice been picked in the top 3 match performers in the league express....



Give the lad a break ffs....

KC, I honestly think we'll get tonked if we start with 12 players.

Not entirely correct.

Its not the amount of players that count

its the players you pick and the position they play in.