alegend:1315trinity:alegend:1315trinity:PopTart:
That doesn't make it any clearer Trojan but I don't have a problem. I just don't understand why you see Walmsley as the best option for 6.
You may be right. I'm not saying you are wrong.
But I don't see a winger who has never played 6 in his life as the next best option.
And more so, see playing one player in a position he doesn't always play but has experience out of position than 2 players out of position with one having never played in a pretty key role.
It's not that it can't happen. Ben Cockayne did it for a while.
I can see where Trojan is coming from.Max is a matchwinner at FB- we really have missed him.
That means Jay pitts again at SO not ideal but at least he probably has more experience there than Walmsley.
I'll leave that poser to the coach!
Think our cover for full back as been very good ,20 minutes laps in cup game does not make him a bad player .
I totally agree ! Roarke is a very good fb but Max has the edge in attack for me. In fact I don't think there is a better fb in SL at creating chances for others - and that includes Welsby who to me is more of an individualist.
Like you big fan of Max ,just let us leave it a while before we say he is one of the best English full back in S L. ,spent last year in Championships ,were he was outstanding .Looked good till he got injured.He as been missed .but not as much as other important position in the team
Just my opinion of course.People forget he didn't just spring up in the championship- he was an excellent fb in SL for a few years
Again, just my opinion , but Max at FB would have lessened the lack of a Recognised SO.
