The thing with the arm was happening while Wilkin was on the floor.

No it wanst, it was used to bring him down.

I think its due to it being dealt with and saying penalty sufficient.

Whether he was brought down by his arm as well I couldn't say as the bit I remember was seeing him working Wilkin's arm while Wilkin was on the floor.

You would see that though wouldn't you, after all all you seem to do is come on here and spout partisan rubbish about your lot.



Wilkin ought to be bl00dy ashamed of himself, its a mans game and squealing to the headmaster when things are not going your way, is not the way a man should be acting.



I fully expect Lima to get a ban. I have no reason to think he deserves one, but that does not count for eff all when the disciplinary get involved.

He didnt he used his arm to bring him down, it was an arm bar.

You just wrote in your previous post that in your view Lima brought Wilkin down with his arm. I did not see that happen. What I saw was what the Sky camera focused upon, which was Lima working Wilkin's arm while Wilkin was on the floor and three tacklers were around him. I think we are talking about two aspects of the same tackle.

Yes it was an arm bar as he locked he arm and moved him where he wanted, not a chicken wing,

No, of course not. In your world, men are all ar$eholes who think it's manly to destroy someone else's career so all the other men think they are $hit hot. In my world that's called being total s.

In rugby its called being a pussy

Ok. Glad we got that bit sorted. I think I did say that I didn't know whether it was a chicken wing, so I will leave that decision to the people who apparently know such stuff! Either way, clearly some element of dangerous play has come into the tackles (on Wilkin and Soliola) or else there would have been no charge. Whether the element of danger is sufficient for a ban remains to be seen. I can't see it myself not because I don't think there was danger - I do - but because the RFL love their warning letters!

Which bit?