The team that tops the league at the end of the regular season should go straight into the final,a two week rest reward for being the most consistant team over the season,the other runners up should be in the play off system to get the chance at the grand final.

You sure?

Theoretically the team finishing 8th has a chance of winning but practically I would argue not. The teams finishing 1st and 2nd are there because they are the better teams. It is unlikely that both will have a poor play-off series and is the reason why they usually win the GF. Only Bradford have done it from 3rd but that season they had injuries and so were really better than the 3rd place finish.



The play-offs are a good climax to the season, bring in revenue, provide publicity and the best teams win it. So I think it is a good system.

Yes they should, but it shouldnt be top 8. Its ridiculous that you can win about 13 games out of 28 in a season and be crowned champions! (even though its unlikely)

Reverse Theoretically and Practically and this would make mathematical sense.



Practically the team finished in 8th has a chance of winning

In Theory they do not.



But it has been won from 3rd, so 3rd is similar to 4th nowa days. Ergo 4th could win and they too have lost a hell uv a lot of games.

I said it on the Dire site and I,ll say it on here,I never understand how the play offs can be compared to winning the regular league. The play offs can be won by winning 4 or so games whilst the regular season takes a massive effort over a couple of dozen games. No brainer.The play offs are fun but it aint no league shield.

It was not intended to be a mathematical argument, smart . The 8th team only has a theoretical chance of winning because the probability of it happening is extremely low. When a team has won it from 8th you can come back on here and tell me it is possible in practice.

Being a football fan first and foremost, I'm of the belief that the league should always be the number one priority. I watch American sports and the play-offs is very 'them', in the NBA and NHL, they have 82-game regular seasons, only to crown the champions on the basis of what happens in the play-offs.



We do the same with RL, but how can winning a few games in a row, or winning a few X match series (America it's best-of-seven) mean more than winning something over the course of the season?



For me, the Challenge Cup should be credited more than the play-offs, as you don't get second chances and it is a knockout competition played over the course of the season, so you rely more on consistency over momentum.



I think we as fans should also credit the league winners more. You get silly idiots saying things like 'We're the champions, the league trophy is a minor trophy'. Embarrassing.

Agree with this



The playoff system is silly but i do try to embrace it, but being brought up a football man its hard to get used to the fact that the league winners get basically no credit... we have playoff games whereas you can lose and be okay because you have another chance and all this 'choosing' who you play... for such an entertaining sport it is indeed embarrassing, hence we get the 'Rugby League is a silly minority sport' drivvel from non rugby league fans. I concede that times are changing and we have to move with the times and it isnt daft to imagine one day football leagues like the English Premier League will adopt a similar kind of system in 20/30 years time or even sooner, though it would purely be a financial move. Sport is Business remember the days of it being a game is long gone.

This year seems to be different though. The sky numpties are talking as though Wire are already champions whereas when Wigan won it last year they were playing it down. Don't get me wrong I believe that finishing top of the league is a great achievement. My point is just how the sky anti-Wigan numpties have changed their tune now that Wigan haven't finished top. It was farcical how they had to keep reminding themselves that Wire still have two games to go to become true Champions. Just to be clear I am not knocking Warrington's success so far and I actually think they will win the GF if they keep playing like they are doing at present.

For me, whoever finishes top at the end of the regular season are the champions (unless of course we get to OT & win

) - the playoffs should be a separate competition, like it used to be in the old days.....I'm not sure I like the current playoff format, too many teams and too many meaningless matches - like last nights and ours v saints. Finish below 6th and you shouldn't be in...mini league of the top 4 top 2 het home advantage, top two after 3 matches to OT anyone?

Yes and No....Ordinarily id say no...but this year is the fairest way of sorting it all out IMO.



Can you imagine how short changed we would have all felt had wire been deemed champions on the back of piping us to top spot, in a game where we were well below par due to a wembley hangover!!



For once, the play offs this year are the fairest way of sorting it, otherwise wire would now be champions by virtue of having the good fortune of the championship decider falling a week after wembley!



At least now in all likelyhood it will be us v wire in the GF and the winner will be able to rightly say they are champions without any comeback....Personally I think that will be us, as long as we play in top gear, which we should in a GF, we're too good for anyone, and as close as wire are, i include them in that. However, if it was to be wire, and wire are good enough to beat us when we are on top form, then fair play to them, they deserve to be champs and i will be as happy as I can be with the GF outcome. After all, at least the result of that game will be fair, instead of the alternative being us losing the championship on the back of unfortunate fixture scheduling, which would have left me pretty miffed!!

Dewsbury won it from 8th in 1973 captained by Stevo. Don't know what route they took though. Probably the main reason why they got rid of playoffs to decide the championship after that year.

Totally support this top 4 mini league that has been mentioned. Think thats a good idea.



It gets rid of the also rans.

It would force clubs 5th to 8th to have to up their game to force into that top 4.

It would produce top class high quality RL with top 4 playing each other for 3 consecutive weeks(help internationally as added bonus).

It reduces the luck factor of a bad refereeing decision or glut of injuries for a specific game prior to GF.

It still gives a GF with a 70k plus crowd.