|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac730/ac730c0f1c82605328a2713112f6cd304c86fa59" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12903 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2021 | Aug 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote DaveO="DaveO"The five system was much better as with that only one team each week went out and there was a more tangible advantage for each place higher up the league you finished than there is now.'"
The top 5 was by far the best format and is missed imo.
The top 8 wont provide the drama imo.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 4100 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Whose LMS?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 18736 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2013 | Jan 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Richards is superman!="Richards is superman!"Whose LMS?'"
Not mine.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 15464 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd like to see this system
Week 1:
Game 1 - 2nd v 5th
Game 2 - 3rd v 4th
Week 2:
Game 3 - Winner G1 v Winner G2 (highest ranked team at home)
Final:
1st v Winner G3
It means you have to finish highish to have a chance, no one can lose a play off game and still win the trophy, it's a big advantage to finish top, no two teams play twice and it's simple. Sadly it'd mean us travelling to either Saints or Leeds and probably getting knocked straight out but I don't think finishing 5th should give you anything like an easy run.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1708 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2008 | 17 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Apr 2015 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Grimmy="Grimmy"I'd like to see this system
Week 1:
Game 1 - 2nd v 5th
Game 2 - 3rd v 4th
Week 2:
Game 3 - Winner G1 v Winner G2 (highest ranked team at home)
Final:
1st v Winner G3
It means you have to finish highish to have a chance, no one can lose a play off game and still win the trophy, it's a big advantage to finish top, no two teams play twice and it's simple. Sadly it'd mean us travelling to either Saints or Leeds and probably getting knocked straight out but I don't think finishing 5th should give you anything like an easy run.'"
That makes too much sense for the rfl, too easy and not complicated enough for everyone.
Basically thats why some people see superleague's format as "silly" all this faffing and the team finishing top potentially not getting to the grand final makes the 27 game regular season to an extent irrelevant! Just ask Nobby data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6da5/f6da5ead84fead471ea5d14392b954bdff4ef2b9" alt="Rolling Eyes icon_rolleyes.gif"
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 5226 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Dec 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote AJ="AJ"The top 5 was by far the best format and is missed imo.
The top 8 wont provide the drama imo.'"
it might if they had used the mcintyre system
1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6, 3 v 5
4 winners go through, plus the 2 highest ranked losers.
2 highest ranked winners get a bye in week 2, and you have 2 elimination games , with highest ranked getting home advantage.
then at week 3 we have 4 teams left.....teams from bye week have home advantage.......and its straight knock out from there, with winners going to old trafford.
simple as ABC data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/df977/df977823b34ec80ba4876c85a37190aa5d8ae24b" alt="Smile icon_smile.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 5226 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2016 | Dec 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Grimmy="Grimmy"I'd like to see this system
Week 1:
Game 1 - 2nd v 5th
Game 2 - 3rd v 4th
Week 2:
Game 3 - Winner G1 v Winner G2 (highest ranked team at home)
Final:
1st v Winner G3
It means you have to finish highish to have a chance, no one can lose a play off game and still win the trophy, it's a big advantage to finish top, no two teams play twice and it's simple. Sadly it'd mean us travelling to either Saints or Leeds and probably getting knocked straight out but I don't think finishing 5th should give you anything like an easy run.'"
TBH i reckon that would make it a disadvantage to finish top.
no game for 3 weeks after seasons finished???
weve seen teams go off the boil just having one week off
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1307 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2011 | Feb 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| i still to this day think the team who finishes top should be crowned champions as they have performed for the full season. The playoffs should be a seperate cup competition.
more than likely upset a few people but thats my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 722 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Grimmy="Grimmy"I'd like to see this system
Week 1:
Game 1 - 2nd v 5th
Game 2 - 3rd v 4th
Week 2:
Game 3 - Winner G1 v Winner G2 (highest ranked team at home)
Final:
1st v Winner G3
It means you have to finish highish to have a chance, no one can lose a play off game and still win the trophy, it's a big advantage to finish top, no two teams play twice and it's simple. Sadly it'd mean us travelling to either Saints or Leeds and probably getting knocked straight out but I don't think finishing 5th should give you anything like an easy run.'"
Problem with top 5 is that we have a 14 team league and no relegation.
With 2 rounds of this campaign remaining 12 of the 14 teams still have everything to play for. Had it been top 5 that would effectively be 6 or 7 teams which could lead to a lethargic and boring last few weeks of the season for some.
If we still had relegation I'd go with the 5 but now that we don't I'm happy to give this a try.............and of course we get more games to enjoy!
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12903 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2021 | Aug 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote wigan pie man="wigan pie man"it might if they had used the mcintyre system
1 v 8, 2 v 7, 3 v 6, 3 v 5
4 winners go through, plus the 2 highest ranked losers.
2 highest ranked winners get a bye in week 2, and you have 2 elimination games , with highest ranked getting home advantage.
then at week 3 we have 4 teams left.....teams from bye week have home advantage.......and its straight knock out from there, with winners going to old trafford.
simple as ABC
'"
I agree, they should have used the NRL system, but instead we get a pick your opponent system with the announcement on sky sports news....wow data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f6da5/f6da5ead84fead471ea5d14392b954bdff4ef2b9" alt="Rolling Eyes icon_rolleyes.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 15464 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote wigan pie man="wigan pie man"TBH i reckon that would make it a disadvantage to finish top.
no game for 3 weeks after seasons finished???
weve seen teams go off the boil just having one week off'"
2 weeks, and yeah I guess you could argue that but I reckon teams would be happy with that much time to concentrate on the final while the opposition are knocking each other to bits.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 12006 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2019 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote mooster="mooster"i still to this day think the team who finishes top should be crowned champions as they have performed for the full season. The playoffs should be a seperate cup competition.
more than likely upset a few people but thats my opinion.'"
Totally agree
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac730/ac730c0f1c82605328a2713112f6cd304c86fa59" alt="" |
|