www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/2 ... -of-glory/ What a pr*ck

www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/2 ... -of-glory/ What a pr*ck

Everyone knows he is, pretty much spot on with this article tho.

Never seen so much in one article

Schofield is a fat and bitter to$$er always has been always will be,if that is the best he can do writing for the Daily star shows how successful he has been .

Pretty much spot on IMO.



Leeds did hav Wigan on the ropes in the second half, Leeds did do well to come back from 16-0 and it was pretty tight game that could have gone either way.



Someone does need to have a word with Tomkins to cut that sort of stuff out and I've no doubt maguire will have a quite little word.

Gracious in defeat?



Not Schofield.



You'd think he would be able to cope with it better though. I mean, he's had a lot of experience of losing over the years.

Don't see anything wrong with that article.



Probably the most balanced and even thing he's ever said.

So you thought Leeds should have won the game? Anyone who says they should doesn't know what they were watching.

Here we go again. Another defensive Wigan fab who ain't read my post.



Where did I say Leeds deserved to win?



I said Leeds was the better team in the second half and it was a tight game that could have gone either way.

You said you agreed with the article in which Big Fat Gary Schofield implies Leeds should have won.

Wigan were uncharacteristically shaky for much of the game. They looked very nervous before the kick-off - you could tell from their faces when they were warming up down at our end.



But they still won - which is always a good sign when you're not playing well - and the scoreline was not misrepresentative.



It's hardly Wigan's fault if Leeds can't defend near their own line. With Wigan two props down and Lockers hurt as well, I'd have thought Leeds would actually have made a better fist of that second half than they did.

Where does he say that.