I'd have had them both on the bench and not included Griffin.

Lets see how many tackle busts and tries he accumulates on Saturday then. If he continues where he left off last season with high and late tackles the NZ pack will send him home in a bucket.

And made more tackles, fewer missed tackles, more offloads, more clean breaks etc. Maybe the coach thinks having Tomkins attacking coming off the bench is a better option for the team, especially considering Harrisons poor defensive stats.



[urlhttp://www.superleague.co.uk/statistics_player.php?hs1=2010&hp1=2163&hs2=2010&hp2=1813&stat=missed_tackles&season=2010[/url

I actually agree that Joel Tomkins is better, but using stat's is a stupid argument. Statistically Myler is a better attacking threat than Sam Tomkins. I'm pretty sure you'd agree that isn't correct.

I don't see the point of playing Westwood from the bench as you wouldn't class him as an impact player.



Whose the little general in that side whose going to take us round the pitch, i see no natural organiser in that side and no decent tactical kicker.

I think this has been missing for years in the GB/England set-up, you know the kind of role that a certain Mr Briers got overlooked for GB many times.

We are going to get murdered. That's the weakest England team I've seen on paper for some time, and we werent any good when it looked good on paper.

I would of swapped Westwood and Fielden and put Burgess to Prop. Also shows how poor our backs are when Goulding is playing. Hes had a good season at Wigan but is not international standard.

Name 5 players on that team who are genuine international standard? Graham, Burgess, Ellis, Tomkins. And, erm....

Roby imo.

I'd agree with that.

Even if I agreed (which I don't), it's still only 5!