The club have confirmed it as well on the Facebook page.



I did think it was a bit strange when I went on the disciplinary page on the RFL website and it said NFA, (i.e. No Further Action) which is usually what they put when there isn't a ban, and then 1 match suspension next to that. Possibly an error typing it up....

If you look at my earlier post from yesterday, a copy from the RFL site it clearly says no suspension, that is why I copied it, how badly run is the RFL if it can't understand one of it's own committees.

I wonder who pointed this out to them?

I'd love to know what you saw, then?

What does it matter what i saw? Wild got charged so the people that matter saw what was needed to be seen. At what point did i say O'Meley was Innocent in this he was charged, which is what i'm getting at. Wild was charged also so must of played his part. Sat in the south stand at the KC i couldn't make out if anything happened (ref cheap shots in the tackle). Clearly with you all saying Wild is innocent, shouldn't of been charge ect, means you all must have great eye sights all 5 that came that is, even better then video the match commissioner used to review any incident.





BTW if he hasn't been banned i'd say that's a good result as it was the ref who lost control causing this incident anyway. Shame we cannot ban refs lol

well clearly you have terrible eyesight, so what you say you saw we can discount, or you have a problem counting and need to go back to school.

Could you have done that without having a dig at our support? I think you could have done, couldn't you?



By the way, I was sat in the South Stand and I could see who had thrown the first punch. If you're going to suspend Wild, then O'Meley should be suspended as well. He also happened to be the one who got sin-binned, remember?



People have stated exactly what they saw, not some fantasy which paints Wild as completely innocent.

I'm thinking your not very bright.















oh dear, never mind. maybe you all should send your views to red hall and tell them too, he was charged and accepted it. Blind or not that tells you all he was guilty.



i agree both should get same punishment. As for the sin bin its always the retaliation that gets done.





You really have some blinkered fools on this board and i thought ours was bad.

I'm thinking you're thick, but I didn't want to point this out, again in your posting you indicate a need to go back to school.

This is a debate that you just can't quite grasp. Either add something that may require a brain cell or jog on

must have won then, you stated we only brought 5 fans, therefore I questioned your ability to count, you also suggested you saw something totally different to what other people saw in the same stand as you, then you make more errors and now I'm getting bored pointing these things out to you.

Wrong



You brought not many fans at all maybe 30 i didn't count, so if that's right i'm not far wrong my bad. (wasn't having a go about it btw as wouldn't be d if you brought 0).



I've never stated i saw anything, just stated what you guys are saying you saw is wrong as he got charged. (i know this is hard to swallow but its fact)



now i'm bored pointing out that you clearly are stupid..

Oof. Now [ithat's[/i unfortunate.