Suspected Broken Jaw

Broken Nose

Teeth knocked out



but hey, he'd already knocked on so its OK

Foul play used to override technical infringements.

not bad considering there was no contact with the head according to Thaler.

His injuries are irrelivant to whether it was foul play

To be fair to thalet he asked the vid refs opinion and even at slow motion they couldnt see a head tackle!! Then again they also did see a widnes arm that didnt exist for the second try even after looking half a dozen times. Ganson is great at vid ref aint he

How would one break their nose, cheek, and knock 2 teeth out without touching their head?

Please explain how he suffers such injuries if there's no contact to the head?



Is contact to the head illegal in Rugby League?



Does MacGraf Lieuluai make contact with Matty Russells head?



If you answer yes, please explain why he should be exempt from punishment

This is blatant proof of foul play he should have walked. How do you break someone nose, cheekbone and knock out two knashers without serious amount of contact to the head.

I have seen players sustain exactly those injuries making a tackle, does that mean they have been fouled?

So Warrington didn't have a say in their own comeback and as a more experienced play off team didn't have anything to do with Widnes building a lead in the first place you know....'' awful game management decisions, stupid passes, penalties, etc' ?



I think you're a bit confused BOD confusing

Most likely as players 9/10 sustain those injuries through illegal contact with the head

Russell was the ball carrier.



If you can't comprehend why that would make a difference there's no point correcting you.

poor lad if he has had that much facial damage.



So who to choose because its obvious from the displays this weekend its Catalan and Warrington