If this had been said this at the start we would of saved ourselves a week of debate!!

No it wouldn't, because you're obviously just some toerag who likes to see his name in print. Now p*ss off.

More to do with the fare offered I think, but too high for what was received, yes,

Does this forum have a moderator...for knuckle draggers like this?

You haven't asked for anything, just persisted in being boring.



Having attended all but one of the Hull v Wigan games at the KC, I used the best evidence available to me to judge the numbers in the away end, my eyes.



Now trot along, for someone who never actually went to that fixture you seem to be obsessed by it.

If the moderators were doing their job, you'd be long gone by now.

I asked you where you got those statisitcs from?



You are basing this on what you saw...bit technical that.

Bloody Norah, you're like herpes. Just when you think it's all clear you flare up again

Its those Hull lasses

The 2007 game was the 2nd round of the play offs so the 16k gate is slightly exaggerated because of this. You have a point. But in a perverse sort of way the whole reason for the thread, the price disparity for home and away fans, is actually Hull FC trying to attract back those missing home fans by offering those who would attend more games at the KC on a yearly basis, a more affordable option.

The point, which you are persisting in missing, is that I never quoted any statistics (percentages, ratio's numerical data). So I had no reason to respond to your question regarding stats.



And, yes, basing something on what you see. The lawyers out there would call this Witness evidence

So basically your argument lacks any credible evidence or rigour then? Its down to your own perspective and interpretation...oh dear