If these lads are all a year or two younger than the AIS, surely a 2 point loss is a good result?

How did Cunningham go? no 9.

The entire team was 17 and under, many were 17-18 age band ie under 18's in old money.

Majority of the team have played at under 18's level all last season (some for under 20's and even 1st team if good enough), so most actually over 17 if not all! But then this would make most of them, over 18 next summer!? So what age group is it that tours?

was going to mention this then you did ! there must av been at least 10 players who are in there last year ov un 18s and move on to un 20s next season , so for everybody inc the rfl to bill it a un17 team is totaly wrong !

England had four players in their team who played under 16's this past season.

so would it be right to say there was only 4 un 17 players in a full england side billed as a un 17 team then ?

You can be 17 and still play under 17s IIRC.



Of course there may be a lot of 17 year olds that play U20s too. For example John Bateman has played a lot of U20s despite being 17, plus he's played a handful of 1st team games too.

The cut-off date in the RFL operational rules is midnight on 31 August before the start of the competition, so for Under 18 Academy players in 2011 that meant being aged under 18 on 31 August 2010.

That's who it was!!! Kept staring at him in car park as couldn't think who he was

One of the best out there IMO. Always alert and had a great eye for a gap.

Any relation to Kieran