What if it wouldn't have happened to Rugby League - where would we be? I was reading the introduction to an article on this, and I couldn't find the rest of the article. It seemed to have fundamentally change the game, so what would Rugby League look like if the SL War would not have happened?

As Mao said when asked about the effects of the French revolution - its too soon to tell!

British RL would be in a deep, deep financial mess. Sky's money as a result of News Ltd trying to build up their RL empire is more valuable to the sport that what many users on here think.

There was no Super League war in this country. All our clubs rolled over and lapped it up like the financially inept and unsustainable messes that they were.



You should post the question on an Aussie forum somewhere, they might have more of an answer.

In the UK?

Part-time clubs with a couple of exceptions....attendances lower than Quins RL manage with a couple of exceptions and Australia hammering England GB every time they play (no change there then).

In Australia? Intersting one, but IMO the game would be weaker. The combined might of a united organisation and Murdochs millions and media coverage have helped the game....some will bemoan the good old days, but I honestly think that if dally messenger is right, and they secure $1 Billion in TV revenue next time around, this will be BECAUSE of the SL War....

I would think that in the UK, something of a scaled down version of the SL would have happened, albeit with lower attendances.

IMO if the Superleague war had not happened in Aus it would probably be the number 1 sport in Australia and even New Zealand.

As it happens AFL have taken huge strides and the timing could of not been worse with union only recently going professional.

I'm still not 100% on the detail who actually happened in the SL War, as I have said before, I wasn't around at the time (I was, but I was 5). Could anyone point me in the way of a reliable source on what happened?

I know some of the details but if you PM dally messenger he seems to know quite a lot about it,good luck.

I’m quite intrigued by the idea that Rugby League could possibly be the biggest sport in New Zealand now if it were not for the Super League war. It is widely accepted that the recent development of the profile of the sport in NZ was based on the formation of the New Zealand Warriors (formerly Auckland Warriors) in 1995. As a result of the Super League war they left the ARL in 1997 to compete in the Super League competition before joining the newly-formed NRL the following year



Some five years later, the Warriors made it to the 2002 Grand Final which created great interest in the sport and the recent success of the Kiwis in the tri and four Nations and of course their great World Cup triumph has continued this momentum



Despite all of this, any right thinking individual recognises that Rugby Union is the dominant sport in New Zealand, as it has been for the last century. I would be the first to welcome the arrival of RL as the number one sport in New Zealand but I have to ask what you think was missing in the 12 months from 1997 to 98 that would have propelled the sport to these heights?

Must....resist....temptation.....it's christmas after all



As for RL being the number 1 sport in New Zealand......not in anyone here's lifetime that's for sure

Id have a team to support !