|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/badba/badbad0558590414fff5b8f88203dea12640e679" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17169 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote paulwalker71="paulwalker71"Fortunately, in Mick Potter we now have a coach who is intelligent enough to do just that. I expect him to have a video made of the all the various questionable decisions, for team talks later in the week
'"
If he is so intelligent perhaps he will be copying Leeds' obviously successful ploy? And I would bet my mortgage he doesn't have such a video made, they were not the reasons Bradford lost. He will be looking at individual & collective errors & successes.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 884 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2017 | Jun 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Bully_Boxer="Bully_Boxer"Doubtful, I would hope and expect he has done a video of the things the players can control and improve on. There will always be 50-50 calls that go against a side but there were some things we could have done better on Sunday that would have given us our 1st win of 2011.'"
Totally agree with this, we shouldn't have been in a position to worry about 50/50 decisions after building up the lead. Bit of composure and tighter play could have seen us home.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote tigertot="tigertot"If he is so intelligent perhaps he will be copying Leeds' obviously successful ploy? And I would bet my mortgage he doesn't have such a video made, they were not the reasons Bradford lost. He will be looking at individual & collective errors & successes.'"
But there is a big difference between an honest mistake and incompetence. I haven't replayed and won't be replaying the Buderus incident, as our game has gone and I've said my bit; but in ANY televised game, IF it is correct that a player in a VR call did get involved in the play after starting blatantly offside and the Video Ref missed it, then that's actually a huge error by the VR. If I were Cummings, I would think such incompetence was on the inexcusable side of slack.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2342 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I can't seem to find the thread asking where Leeds' goal line drop out was when Kearney was clearly tackled behind the line? Which is also clearly visible on video evidence. Or are we only picking up on ref errors that didn't go in your favour?
Funny that.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 4371 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2017 | Nov 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Remarkable_Rhinos="Remarkable_Rhinos"I can't seem to find the thread asking where Leeds' goal line drop out was when Kearney was clearly tackled behind the line? Which is also clearly visible on video evidence. Or are we only picking up on ref errors that didn't go in your favour?
Funny that.'"
I missed the one where Royston was taken out in exactly the same vein to BJB by Brett Delaney, resulting in a totally different outcome.
The point made at the start of this thread is a perfectly valid one, it was an enormous thing to miss from the officials, especially with the facility of the VR being available for usage. I for one aren't saying it cost us the game blah blah, I don't think it did, but these kinds of things should not be missed.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 9986 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2019 | Aug 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Remarkable_Rhinos="Remarkable_Rhinos"I can't seem to find the thread asking where Leeds' goal line drop out was when Kearney was clearly tackled behind the line? Which is also clearly visible on video evidence. Or are we only picking up on ref errors that didn't go in your favour?
Funny that.'"
Was the VR asked to look at it? No?
Think the point is that the VR was asked to look at the legality of the Leeds try, he totally failed to spot the infringement by Buderus. He could have taken as long as he liked to look at it to check he got it right. He took enough time to make up...er...see Walker's knock on so there should be no excuse for getting this one wrong too. So an error by the VR. Not a "real time mistake" by the ref.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 28357 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | Oct 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Remarkable_Rhinos="Remarkable_Rhinos"I can't seem to find the thread asking where Leeds' goal line drop out was when Kearney was clearly tackled behind the line? Which is also clearly visible on video evidence. Or are we only picking up on ref errors that didn't go in your favour?
Funny that.'"
Not half as funny as a pis =#FFFFFF[size=50.[/sizespoor troll attempt failing miserably due to inability to understand what the thread is actually about.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4e26/a4e265f9bb10208b45b0055657658f72ea7c64ee" alt="BEAT icon_beat.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17169 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Ferocious Aardvark="Ferocious Aardvark"But there is a big difference between an honest mistake and incompetence. I haven't replayed and won't be replaying the Buderus incident, as our game has gone and I've said my bit; but in ANY televised game, IF it is correct that a player in a VR call did get involved in the play after starting blatantly offside and the Video Ref missed it, then that's actually a huge error by the VR. If I were Cummings, I would think such incompetence was on the inexcusable side of slack.'"
I didn't see it at the time, neither did the ref or VR, neither did it get mentioned by the Sky team. So until I see it for myself, or read an admittance of mistake by the RL, I will assume it is more bitter paranoia from an embarrassingly large minority.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 2342 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2010 | 14 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2011 | Dec 2011 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote debaser="debaser"Was the VR asked to look at it? No?
Think the point is that the VR was asked to look at the legality of the Leeds try, he totally failed to spot the infringement by Buderus. He could have taken as long as he liked to look at it to check he got it right. He took enough time to make up...er...see Walker's knock on so there should be no excuse for getting this one wrong too. So an error by the VR. Not a "real time mistake" by the ref.'"
It was a "real time mistake" though wasn't it. The VR is not allowed to look for something that he wasn't asked to look for. He can't just decide to have a gander at everything that's going on.
You clearly hear the ref say stuff like... "Just check the grounding for me Steve mate!", or "Just looking to see if Graham was onside please!". The VR can't take it upon himself to say, "The grounding was fine but whilst I was looking at the grounding I noticed this...". The VR can only look at what he has been asked to look at.
Ganson made a "real time mistake" and didn't spot Buderus, so didn't ask Silverwood to check. The fact that the VR might have spotted it is irrelevant. He wasn't asked to check it because of Ganson's "real time mistake". There was no error by the VR.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7239 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Remarkable_Rhinos="Remarkable_Rhinos"It was a "real time mistake" though wasn't it. The VR is not allowed to look for something that he wasn't asked to look for. He can't just decide to have a gander at everything that's going on.
You clearly hear the ref say stuff like... "Just check the grounding for me Steve mate!", or "Just looking to see if Graham was onside please!". The VR can't take it upon himself to say, "The grounding was fine but whilst I was looking at the grounding I noticed this...". The VR can only look at what he has been asked to look at.
'"
I don't want to get involved in the actual debate, but I just wanted to point out that what you have said her is complete and total b0llocks. It's something that's been made up by someone (be it a fan or a pundit) and is actually not true at all. The video ref can call anything he sees and look at anything he chooses up to the last play-the-ball. If he thinks he's seen something that the referee hasn't mentioned, he is well within his authority to check it.
Incidentally, my source on this is Stuart Cummings himself.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 17169 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Remarkable_Rhinos="Remarkable_Rhinos"It was a "real time mistake" though wasn't it. The VR is not allowed to look for something that he wasn't asked to look for. He can't just decide to have a gander at everything that's going on.
You clearly hear the ref say stuff like... "Just check the grounding for me Steve mate!", or "Just looking to see if Graham was onside please!". The VR can't take it upon himself to say, "The grounding was fine but whilst I was looking at the grounding I noticed this...". The VR can only look at what he has been asked to look at.
Ganson made a "real time mistake" and didn't spot Buderus, so didn't ask Silverwood to check. The fact that the VR might have spotted it is irrelevant. He wasn't asked to check it because of Ganson's "real time mistake". There was no error by the VR.'"
Was there an incident between 2 teams somewhere in Wales around 2007 when a VR took it upon himself to act outside his powers? Perhaps someone on here can remember.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7239 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Apr 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Feb 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote tigertot="tigertot"Was there an incident between 2 teams somewhere in Wales around 2007 when a VR took it upon himself to act outside his powers? '"
The difference being there, that is was during live action and it hadn't been referenced to the VR. Since that incident, the Video Referee's Microphone is not switched on during normal play, and is only used when he is requested. But once he is requested, he is free to chirp in on things the referee may not have seen.
Again, straight from the mouth of Mr Cummings.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/badba/badbad0558590414fff5b8f88203dea12640e679" alt="" |
|