We all know that Hood leaves a lot to be desired. That's not the issue. The issue is what we do about it. And the consensus here on RAB appears to be to pledge, do our bit to help Bradford avoid administration, and deal with the consequences of the almighty cockups that have led us to this point.



This seems to be the outcome of a large number of people's own personal cost/benefit analyses regarding what to do. Where's yours?

Think some of us have formed our owns views as to his already?



Revenge?



With the poor, in too many cases unsuspecting, fans as the foot-soldiers.



Getting rattled, Chris? Breached any good confidentiality agreements recently?

Surely nobody would be stupid enough to do something as silly as that would they? Then I remember the pi55ing contest with Leeds over Harrisgate and it all makes sense...............

I think we're all in for more displays of competitive urination of the next few days but you can only fool some of the people some of the time, not all the people all of the time.

If as suggested, this is Mr C, then congratulations, you've made my mind up about you.



Your quite frankly, pathetic and disgusting attempts to derail the pledge scheme by showing up in the T&Alast Thursday (appropriate timing), coupled with your disgraceful and childish remarks on here, have made mine and several other fans minds up.

If indeed you are Chris, you are more of a pathetic little man than either I could have imagined......



Where have you been hiding these last 5 years?



Why would you choose to aid the sale of one of our best respects for years?



What actually are YOUR plans?



Peter Hood has spent the last 5 years sorting out the mess you left last time and now there is a sniff of it all being sorted, out you crawl from the gutter. Go back, we don't want you



Ps: happy to discuss any of this with you in personif you wish?

Right, so the claim about the VAT is outright lies then? Similarly, HMRC? Similarly the RFL loans (twice apparently)? Similarly the overall figure we're in debt?



Surely the issue is whether what he is saying is correct and not whether or not he is Chris ******* Caisley?

Not really, because a man who wants to take control of a professional sports club should not be airing his dirty libellous laundry on a fans forum.

Is there any actual evidence that Gurus Beard is Chris Caisley?



Or is it just something somebody 'overheard in the pub' or - even worse - just made up on the spur of the moment?



Everybody on here seems very sure of it for some reason. Just wondered what that reason was

It's pretty obvious that only Chris Caisley is the only person who could have issue with the superb way Peter Hood has led the club in the last six years and handled this current situation which has arisen only because of things out of his control.

He's not Chris Caisley, unless when he stepped down he started supporting Saints!

Even more of a pathetic looser then!