Does anyone know which club havent paid the players this month?

No, but clearly you've heard something and are keen to tell everyone

Is it us?



If not I dont care.

My guess is he's read Dane Chisholm's Twitter.

Perhaps if Chisholm didn't go around taking wages and sitting at home clubs would be in a better state. And I don't know if is us he's talking about but that is what he is inferring. IF it isn't us perhaps a solicitors letter could get him to keep his gob shut. If only he'd put as much effort into playing.

Month isn’t over yet

I hope we aren’t mixed up in this.



It’s an attention seeking tweet from Dane that stirs up some bad memories for our fans.

It's a tweet that has been liked by three separate members of the 19-man squad that will face Widnes tomorrow.



Personally, I won't believe it until Mick Gledhill says it's untrue.

Well, his responses in the comments strongly suggest it's us



I don't know anything, but I know that I get paid on the last day of the month. It defaults to the previous Friday if the last day falls over the weekend. But I guess it could end up dropping into my bank on the Monday if there was a banking glitch.



Just surmising, but maybe that's what's happened here (fingers crossed)



Also noting that Chisholm signed a three-year deal with Fev last week, so he's now got the security to start acting up.

Interesting that he talks about his friends. Does he think that creating this kind of unrest is going to be good for them A-hole.

Well with Chalmers constantly slagging off SL he had to make sure we were squeaky clean. There may be perfectly explainable reasons (I'm sure Roger knows more of what's going on) but it's serious basics and social media will be loving it now.

The twitter post says...



[i"Lending money to mates because they haven’t been paid and have bills to pay. Won’t mention what club. It’s not right... one job, pay your players !!!" [/i



Despite several tweets asking for clarification about which club is involved, Chisholm seems to be gloating in his inside knowledge and happy to let everyone go into meltdown about whether its Bradford or not.



Certainly doesn't look great that some of the Bulls 1st team squad have liked it too but that said so have some other players not associated with us. He's been ramping up the anti-Bulls rhetoric since he left and seems to be more interested in stirring up than it being a genuine concern. If he was, I don't know how de-stabilising a club with cryptic tweets goes about helping them.