Yes. Using that terminology (it was actually 'natural gift', but it doesn't matter) doesn't change the context of the sentence in bold, in fact it reinforces it.



Whilst we are being all condescending about it, you were relating the genetic predisposition (natural gift, talent, etc) of a four year old child through his ability to throw a a paintball during your reception class to the fact that he could 'go on to make it' (your words) at a sport in which such motor skills might be in some way related. I'm glad that the children had a great time, and that you felt a level of satisfaction when you informed your superior of this, but anyone with an ounce of knowledge on the subject or even half a brain could gather that it is absolute nonsense.



Maybe you have the natural talent to be a politician in your willingness to try and bend what you originally said. Did you have this at four, or did it develop later?

I have gathered that you are a total idiot, that's for sure.

I wonder why this doesn't surprise me ...

Widnes. Until we went into administration

The OP got the name wrong or he is a relative taking the Mick!

Can I just make a point that I don't think you should name these young lads on the internet. My lad has just finished U12's season and I wouldn't be happy seeing his name on here even if people were saying he's the next KC

I think this is a really good point and should be controlled through the mods.

I actually agree. U15 when they make Saints scholarship is ok but 13 is seriously too young.



Can the mods delete topic?

Agreed.

look at my user name, widnes of course.

i watched the game on a dvd again last week and i certainly did not get the name wrong, and no i am not a relative!