If he's thinking like you, does that mean the back on the bench has gone?

He ain't good enough.

Ben Fisher? FFS we'd be better off with Climie Fisher!

They'd at least rise to the occasion.

Quoting yourself. It's Not Supposed To Be That Way

Shush, you are just keeping the mystery alive

I think you know opinion on that, I'm not going down that route until the season starts.

I think you've warmed too much to the idea of it rather than the practicalities of Fisher being the player you imagine him to be

I just think he'd do a good job for us, add depth and means we can leave lomax, hohaia and flanaghan in their proper positions.



Fisher is a clever cunning player which IMO we needed in the games where teams nulified robes running game.



On the subject of roby, I don't think we can flog him like we did last year, the back end of the season he looked tired and didn't offer any impact like he had in the first half of the season.

Correctamundo Peter. Roby is the long term future of saints and we need to ensure that we don't completely thrash him week in week out. I would prefer him to be doing no more than 50 mins per week

Precisely why the ludicrous argument that we can afford to play games with 16 men as we can just thrash Roby all year winds me up so much.



This is even more important now interchanges are down. Hopefully we've seen the end of the unused substitute at Saints under Royce.

Totally agree!



As most know on here, it drives me feckin mad the while back on the bench that royce opts for!



You'd see jammer and robes out on their feet while a back is sat on the bench scraching his balls!



Modern day players can play in more than one postion. Teams train them to play other positions yet royce stuck to flogging certain players while some didn't even do a minute!