Whatever you say hon.

Its pure comedy this.



My immediate thoughts on reading the article were that he managed to comtinue playing on for 3/4 of the match without any problems.



JJB is lodging an appeal..... surely not a cynical ploy by the phantom dummy spitter to put pressure on the RFL to increase his ban ?

DROPPED





That game was the worst performance by a prop I have seen this season..





and the antics at the end of it brought a once great club into disripute.

If thats the case the medics should be sued for severe professional negligence for failing to bring him off straight away.



Failing that its impossible to prove which tackle (if any) caused the injury and the press release is borderline libelous IMHO

I think if they were going to make use of the situation, they would have had a press release before they decided the ban.



It sounds to me like his shoulder is too injured to play/or risk him, and they wanted to make very clear it was the chicken wing incident that caused the injury.

Which 2 teams will Leeds lose to for that to happen?

The RFL obviously think it was JJB, there is that evidence enough?

So should the Leeds medics be sued for failing to bring Sinfield off as well? Oh thats right he only had a phantom broken cheekbone didn't he.

The difference is in Sinfields case they were proven right before the event and ih Grhamas case they apparnetly got it wrong



PS yes rather like the big fannys phantom shoulder injury

IF that was the "worst performance"...Given that he made more meters than any of the leeds pack off fewer carries, made more tackles with less misses - what does that make your team's performance?

Huh? That makes no sense.



Go away and learn English, then you can come back and write your post again. In fact, just go away.

Just that a "TEAM" performance without over-reliance on 1 man!!

H-T-H.