See Jamie Thackray





[i"Hull re-signed the prop forward from Leeds after the initial deadline of March 3 and played him in their 42-5 fourth-round win at Rochdale on April 20."[/i

Thanks for your quote, but it's quite irrelevant. Unless Leeds are wanting McShane to play in further rounds of the cup for themselves then it does not matter whether McShane plays or not.

The 19 man squad was announced yesterday and he's not in it,

that means nothing, half our team that played at Wigan wasnt in the 19 either

New signings can be added to the squad.







but he wont be playing even if he has signed.

If he came for the year then we would have to utilise Berrigan as a centre when he gets back which wont happen

This cannot be true because part of Buderus remit is to pass on his knowledge to the young hooker McShane.



That's the line that's been trotted out whenever I've questioned his onfield input anyway.



"But, But, he is passing on his extensive knowledge and skills to the young hookers at the club"

Maybe his knowledge has all run out?

Maybe they think Berrigan has more knowledge!

He was named in tonights u20 team to take on Hull at stanningley so i guess if he's not there it could be true.

It would be a good move imo 1st team chance at SL level can only benefit us and him long term.

He wont be in our 17 tomorrow so i'd guess he can play for your 20s tonight and then join us from Monday?

Rumour has it Kath told Gary if he wouldn't cough up a replacement for Berrigan he would have to start sleeping with her again.....Gary offered Diskin & Buderus, but Kath explained McShane would do.